Edo Guber: Court strikes out suits against Ighodalo’s candidacy for PDP

na_logo

Subscribe To Our Newsletter

Get Daily News, Tips, Trends and Updates in your mailbox

Latest News

The Right Place for you comfort furniture's

Living Room

We offer a wide variety of furniture for homes and offices

Dinning Set

We provide stylish and high-quality dinning interior furnishing solutions.

Bedroom

We manufacture and produce complete bedroom furniture and interior furnishing products.

Share

Join us in a transformative journey towards better care for Deltans and support for all.

Justice Inyang Ekwo of the Federal High Court, Abuja, Tuesday, struck out two separate suits challenging the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP)’s primary election that produced Asue Ighodalo as the party’s governorship candidate for the coming Edo State gubernatorial election.

In the ruling, Justice Ekwo held that those who instituted the suits from the political camp of former Deputy Governor of the state, Philip Shuaib, have no locus standi.

The court held that the plaintiffs failed to exhibit sufficient, direct, and tangible personal interest that could lead the court to nullify the primary election.

The first suit marked: FHC/ABJ/CS/195/2024, was filed by Adizetu Umoru, while the second suit marked: FHC/ABJ/CS/196/2024, was filed by Moses Alabi and Christopher Oboarer.

The plaintiffs had sued the Independent National Electoral Commission(INEC), PDP, Umar Damagu (acting national chairman), Setonji Koshoedo, PDP’s National Working Committee (NWC), and its National Executive Committee (NEC) as 1st to 6th defendants respectively.

The three plaintiffs, in their separate motions filed on February 19, sought an interim order of the court restraining the defendants from using the list of ward congresses held in February. 4, for the purpose of conducting the PDP’s primary in Edo State, slated for February. 22 or any other date pending the hearing and determination of the main suit.

Justice Ekwo, however, held that the plaintiffs did not establish how their individual interests were affected or jeopardized by the primary election.

Specifically, the judge said that the plaintiffs did not establish whether they were eligible to participate in the election but prevented or whether wrongdoings were displayed during the election.

Related Post